Skip to content
Head to head

Cort MR500F-CED vs Yamaha CSF

Cort MR500F-CED
Acoustic-Electric
No ratings yet
68Overall / 100
Yamaha CSF
Yamaha
CSF
Acoustic-Electric
No ratings yet
77Overall / 100

The verdict

The Yamaha CSF comes out ahead overall — 77 to 68 on our estimated score.

Estimated from specs & owner reviews — a starting point, not a substitute for playing both.

Cort MR500F-CED wins on

No standout advantage.

Yamaha CSF wins on
  • Better build (89 vs 63)
  • Better value (76 vs 68)

Scorecard

Estimated scores
MetricMR500F-CEDCSF
Overall6877
Build6389
Playability7272
Sound6868
Value6876

Full specifications

Specification comparison
SpecMR500F-CEDCSF
BrandCortYamaha
TypeAcoustic-ElectricAcoustic-Electric
Years
CountryJP
Body woodMahoganySolid Mahogany
Neck woodMahoganyNato
FretboardOvangkolRosewood
Strings66
Frets20
Scale25.51"23.62"
PickupsFishman® Presys VTPassive System (SRT Piezo)
Rating
Price
BindingABS Aged White
Body shapeDreadnought CutawayCSF
Bracing PatternAdvanced X-Bracing
Bridge MaterialOvangkolRosewood
Bridge Pin MaterialAged White with Black Dot
CaseNoneHard Bag
ColorsBlack Satin (BKS)
ConstructionDovetail Neck Joint
ControlsFishman® Presys VTPassive System (SRT Piezo)
Cutaway StyleVenetian
Fretboard radius15.75” (R400)15 3/4" (R400 mm)
Head ShapeCort Basic
Inlay6mm White Dot
LabelNone
Neck Heel ShapeTriangle Heel Shape
Neck profileC Shape
Neck Thickness1st Fret: 21.5mm / 8th Fret: 22.0mm
Nut SaddlePPS
Nut width1 11/16″ (43mm)1 11/16" (43 mm)
PickguardAged White
RosetteMultiple ABS Aged White / Black
Scale length25.5″ (648mm)23 5/8" (600 mm)
Sound Hole100mm
Top MaterialSolid Red CedarSolid Sitka Spruce
Truss rodDual Acting / 4mm Wrench
TunersDie-CastDie-Cast Chrome
AccessoriesHex Wrench
Back MaterialSolid Mahogany
Body BindingBlack + White
Body Depth3 3/8-4" (85-105 mm)
Body FinishGloss
Body Length18" (450 mm)
Bridge PinsBlack ABS with White Dot
ConnectionsLINE OUT
NutUrea
Saddle MaterialUrea
Side MaterialSolid Mahogany
Sound Hole InlayAbalone + Black
String Spacing11 mm

More MR500F-CED comparisons