Skip to content
Head to head

ESP B-204SM NATURAL SATIN vs Ibanez EHB1505S

ESP B-204SM NATURAL SATIN
Bass$649
No ratings yet
80Overall / 100
Ibanez EHB1505S
Ibanez
EHB1505S
Bass—
No ratings yet
65Overall / 100

The verdict

The ESP B-204SM NATURAL SATIN comes out ahead overall — 80 to 65 on our estimated score.

Estimated from specs & owner reviews — a starting point, not a substitute for playing both.

ESP B-204SM NATURAL SATIN wins on
  • Better build (87 vs 61)
  • Better playability (81 vs 67)
  • Better value (83 vs 65)
Ibanez EHB1505S wins on

No standout advantage.

Scorecard

Estimated scores
MetricB-204SM NATURAL SATINEHB1505S
Overall8065
Build8761
Playability8167
Sound6868
Value8365

Full specifications

Specification comparison
SpecB-204SM NATURAL SATINEHB1505S
BrandESPIbanez
TypeBassBass
Years——
CountryJP—
Body woodAshPoplar Burl topSelected light weight African Mahogany
Neck wood5Pc Maple/JatobaPanga Panga
FretboardRoasted JatobaPanga Panga
Strings45
Frets2424
Scale34"30"
PickupsESP SB-4N / ESP SB-4BNordstrand™ Custom Big Split / Nordstrand™ Custom Big Split
Rating——
Price$649—
BridgeLTD BB-604 w/ String ThruMR5HS bridge
Bridge pickupESP SB-4BNordstrand™ Custom Big Split bridge pickupPassive
CaseB BASS FORM FIT CASE—
Case IncludedN—
ConstructionBolt-On—
ControlsPassive—
FinishNATURAL SATIN—
Fretboard radius400mm—
HardwareBlack NickelBlack
Neck pickupESP SB-4NNordstrand™ Custom Big Split neck pickupPassive
Neck profileThin U—
NutMolded—
Nut width40mm—
Scale length34"762mm/30"
Strap ButtonStandard—
Top woodSpalted Maple—
TunersLTD—
A Width—45mm at NUT
B Width—74mm at 24F
C Thickness—19.5mm at 1F
D Thickness—21.5mm at 12F
Equalizer—Vari-mid 3-band EQ w/EQ bypass switch (passive tone control on treble pot)
Factory Tuning—1G,2D,3A,4E,5B
Fret—Medium Stainless Steel frets
Neck Type—EHB59pc Panga Panga/Walnut neck w/Graphite reinforcement rods
Radius—500mmR
String Gauge—.045/.065/.085/.105/.130
String Space—18mm
Top Back Body—Poplar Burl topSelected light weight African Mahogany body

More B-204SM NATURAL SATIN comparisons