Skip to content
Head to head

ESP B-204SM NATURAL SATIN vs Ibanez SR5505

ESP B-204SM NATURAL SATIN
Bass$649
No ratings yet
80Overall / 100
Ibanez SR5505
Ibanez
SR5505
Bass
No ratings yet
76Overall / 100

The verdict

The ESP B-204SM NATURAL SATIN comes out ahead overall — 80 to 76 on our estimated score.

Estimated from specs & owner reviews — a starting point, not a substitute for playing both.

ESP B-204SM NATURAL SATIN wins on
  • Better playability (81 vs 67)
  • Better value (83 vs 75)
Ibanez SR5505 wins on

No standout advantage.

Scorecard

Estimated scores
MetricB-204SM NATURAL SATINSR5505
Overall8076
Build8791
Playability8167
Sound6868
Value8375

Full specifications

Specification comparison
SpecB-204SM NATURAL SATINSR5505
BrandESPIbanez
TypeBassBass
Years
CountryJPJP
Body woodAshOvangkol topAfrican Mahogany
Neck wood5Pc Maple/JatobaRoasted Maple
FretboardRoasted JatobaRosewood
Strings45
Frets2424
Scale34"34"
PickupsESP SB-4N / ESP SB-4BNordstrand™ Big Single wood covered / Nordstrand™ Big Single wood covered
Rating
Price$649
BridgeLTD BB-604 w/ String ThruMR5S bridge
Bridge pickupESP SB-4BNordstrand™ Big Single wood covered bridge pickupPassive
CaseB BASS FORM FIT CASE
Case IncludedN
ConstructionBolt-On
ControlsPassive
FinishNATURAL SATIN
Fretboard radius400mm
HardwareBlack NickelGold
Neck pickupESP SB-4NNordstrand™ Big Single wood covered neck pickupPassive
Neck profileThin U
NutMoldedGraph Tech® BLACK TUSQ XL® nut
Nut width40mm
Scale length34"864mm/34"
Strap ButtonStandard
Top woodSpalted Maple
TunersLTD
A Width45mm at NUT
B Width68mm at 24F
C Thickness19.5mm at 1F
D Thickness21.5mm at 12F
EqualizerIbanez Sonitech Preamp 3-band EQ w/EQ bypass switch (push/pull), 3-way Mid frequency switch w/Hexa Mid system
Factory Tuning1G,2D,3A,4E,5B
FretMedium fretsPrestige fret edge treatment
Neck TypeAtlas-5 HP5pc S-TECH WOOD Roasted Maple/Walnut neck
Radius305mmR
Recommended BagIBB724-BK
String Gauge.045/.065/.085/.105/.130
String Space16.5mm
Top Back BodyOvangkol topAfrican Mahogany body

More B-204SM NATURAL SATIN comparisons