Skip to content
Head to head

ESP D-320E NATURAL SATIN vs Ibanez GA3008CE

ESP D-320E NATURAL SATIN
Acoustic
No ratings yet
82Overall / 100
Ibanez GA3008CE
Ibanez
GA3008CE
Acoustic
No ratings yet
67Overall / 100

The verdict

The ESP D-320E NATURAL SATIN comes out ahead overall — 82 to 67 on our estimated score.

Estimated from specs & owner reviews — a starting point, not a substitute for playing both.

ESP D-320E NATURAL SATIN wins on
  • Better build (96 vs 70)
  • Better playability (78 vs 64)
  • Better value (81 vs 67)
Ibanez GA3008CE wins on

No standout advantage.

Scorecard

Estimated scores
MetricD-320E NATURAL SATINGA3008CE
Overall8267
Build9670
Playability7864
Sound6868
Value8167

Full specifications

Specification comparison
SpecD-320E NATURAL SATINGA3008CE
BrandESPIbanez
TypeAcousticAcoustic
Years
CountryJP
Body woodOvangkolSolid German Spruce
Neck woodMahogany
FretboardRoasted JatobaRosewood
Strings68
Frets2020
Scale25.5"25.6"
PickupsFishman SonicoreFishman® S-Core
Rating
Price
BridgeRoasted Jatoba Bridge w/ Graphtech Nubone SaddleRosewood bridge
Bridge pickupFishman Sonicore
Case-
Case IncludedN
ConstructionSet-Neck
ControlsActive
FinishNatural Satin
Fretboard radius350mm
HardwareBlack
Neck profileThin U
NutGraphtech NuboneBone
Nut width43mm
Scale length25.5"650mm/25.6"
Strap ButtonStandard
Top woodSolid Red CedarSolid German Spruce top
TunersLTD
A Length19 1/16"
A Width67.5mm at NUT
Back SidesAfrican Mahogany back & African Mahogany sides
Battery9V x1
Body BindingAfrican Mahogany body binding
Body shapeCutaway Classical body
B Width14 1/2"
C Max Depth3 15/16"
C Thickness22mm at 1F
D Thickness24mm at 7F
Factory Tuning1E,2B,3G,4D,5A,6E,7B,8F#
Output JackBalanced XLR & 1/4" outputs
PreampIbanez AEQ-SP2 preamp w/Onboard tuner
RadiusFlat
Recommended BagICB540-BK
Saddle MaterialBone
Soundhole RosetteClassical Mosaic Design
String Gauge.030/.034/.041/.029/.034/.044/.050/.059
String Space11.6mm
Top Board PurflingWooden purfling
Tuning MachineGold Classical tuners (14:1 gear ratio)

More D-320E NATURAL SATIN comparisons