Skip to content
Head to head

ESP JB-320E NATURAL SATIN vs Ibanez SR6605

ESP JB-320E NATURAL SATIN
Bass
No ratings yet
82Overall / 100
Ibanez SR6605
Ibanez
SR6605
Bass
No ratings yet
76Overall / 100

The verdict

The ESP JB-320E NATURAL SATIN comes out ahead overall — 82 to 76 on our estimated score.

Estimated from specs & owner reviews — a starting point, not a substitute for playing both.

ESP JB-320E NATURAL SATIN wins on
  • Better build (96 vs 91)
  • Better playability (78 vs 67)
  • Better value (81 vs 75)
Ibanez SR6605 wins on

No standout advantage.

Scorecard

Estimated scores
MetricJB-320E NATURAL SATINSR6605
Overall8276
Build9691
Playability7867
Sound6868
Value8175

Full specifications

Specification comparison
SpecJB-320E NATURAL SATINSR6605
BrandESPIbanez
TypeBassBass
Years
CountryJPJP
Body woodOvangkolMappa Burl topAfrican Mahogany
Neck woodMahoganyRoasted Maple
FretboardRoasted JatobaRosewood
Strings45
Frets2224
Scale34"34"
PickupsFishman SonicoreNordstrand™ Big Single wood covered / Nordstrand™ Big Single wood covered
Rating
Price
BridgeRoasted Jatoba Bridge w/ Bone SaddleMR5S bridge
Bridge pickupFishman SonicoreNordstrand™ Big Single wood covered bridge pickupPassive
Case-
Case IncludedN
ConstructionSet-Neck
ControlsActive
FinishNatural Satin
Fretboard radius400mm
HardwareBlackGold
Neck profileThin U
NutBoneGraph Tech® BLACK TUSQ XL® nut
Nut width38mm
Scale length34"864mm/34"
Strap ButtonStandard
Top woodSolid Red Cedar
TunersLTD
A Width45mm at NUT
B Width68mm at 24F
C Thickness19.5mm at 1F
D Thickness21.5mm at 12F
EqualizerIbanez Sonitech Preamp 3-band EQ w/EQ bypass switch (push/pull), 3-way Mid frequency switch w/Hexa Mid system
Factory Tuning1G,2D,3A,4E,5B
FretMedium fretsPrestige fret edge treatment
Neck pickupNordstrand™ Big Single wood covered neck pickupPassive
Neck TypeAtlas-5 HP5pc S-TECH WOOD Roasted Maple/Walnut neck
Radius305mmR
Recommended BagIBB724-BK
String Gauge.045/.065/.085/.105/.130
String Space16.5mm
Top Back BodyMappa Burl topAfrican Mahogany body

More JB-320E NATURAL SATIN comparisons