Skip to content
Head to head

ESP JB-320E NATURAL SATIN vs PRS SE Kingfisher

ESP JB-320E NATURAL SATIN
Bass
No ratings yet
82Overall / 100
PRS SE Kingfisher
Bass
No ratings yet
63Overall / 100

The verdict

The ESP JB-320E NATURAL SATIN comes out ahead overall — 82 to 63 on our estimated score.

Estimated from specs & owner reviews — a starting point, not a substitute for playing both.

ESP JB-320E NATURAL SATIN wins on
  • Better build (96 vs 61)
  • Better playability (78 vs 67)
  • Better sound (68 vs 60)
  • Better value (81 vs 63)
PRS SE Kingfisher wins on

No standout advantage.

Scorecard

Estimated scores
MetricJB-320E NATURAL SATINSE Kingfisher
Overall8263
Build9661
Playability7867
Sound6860
Value8163

Full specifications

Specification comparison
SpecJB-320E NATURAL SATINSE Kingfisher
BrandESPPRS
TypeBassBass
Years
CountryJP
Body woodOvangkolSwamp Ash
Neck woodMahogany5-Ply Maple with Walnut Strips, Neck-Through Construction
FretboardRoasted JatobaRosewood
Strings44
Frets2224
Scale34"34"
PickupsFishman Sonicore
Rating
Price
BridgeRoasted Jatoba Bridge w/ Bone SaddleHipshot TransTone
Bridge pickupFishman Sonicore
Case-Gig Bag
Case IncludedN
ConstructionSet-NeckNeck Through
ControlsActiveTwo Volume Controls and One Tone Control
FinishNatural Satin
Fretboard radius400mm10"
HardwareBlackChrome
Neck profileThin USE Bass 4
NutBone
Nut width38mm1 19/32"
Scale length34"34"
Strap ButtonStandard
Top woodSolid Red Cedar
TunersLTDHipshot HB6
Fretboard inlayBirds
Headstock LogoSignature "SE"
Neck Depth At The 12 1 2 Fret61/64"
Neck Depth At The 1 2 Fret51/64"
Neck Width At The Body2 33/64"
Truss rodPRS Double-Acting
Truss Rod Cover"Kingfisher"
TuningBass (4 String): E, A, D, G

More JB-320E NATURAL SATIN comparisons