Skip to content
Head to head

ESP JB-320E NATURAL SATIN vs PRS SE Kingfisher

ESP JB-320E NATURAL SATIN
Bass—
No ratings yet
82Overall / 100
PRS SE Kingfisher
Bass—
No ratings yet
63Overall / 100

The verdict

The ESP JB-320E NATURAL SATIN comes out ahead overall — 82 to 63 on our estimated score.

Estimated from specs & owner reviews — a starting point, not a substitute for playing both.

ESP JB-320E NATURAL SATIN wins on
  • Better build (96 vs 61)
  • Better playability (78 vs 67)
  • Better sound (68 vs 60)
  • Better value (81 vs 63)
PRS SE Kingfisher wins on

No standout advantage.

Scorecard

Estimated scores
MetricJB-320E NATURAL SATINSE Kingfisher
Overall8263
Build9661
Playability7867
Sound6860
Value8163

Full specifications

Specification comparison
SpecJB-320E NATURAL SATINSE Kingfisher
BrandESPPRS
TypeBassBass
Years——
CountryJP—
Body woodOvangkolSwamp Ash
Neck woodMahogany5-Ply Maple with Walnut Strips, Neck-Through Construction
FretboardRoasted JatobaRosewood
Strings44
Frets2224
Scale34"34"
PickupsFishman Sonicore—
Rating——
Price——
BridgeRoasted Jatoba Bridge w/ Bone SaddleHipshot TransTone
Bridge pickupFishman Sonicore—
Case-Gig Bag
Case IncludedN—
ConstructionSet-NeckNeck Through
ControlsActiveTwo Volume Controls and One Tone Control
FinishNatural Satin—
Fretboard radius400mm10"
HardwareBlackChrome
Neck profileThin USE Bass 4
NutBone—
Nut width38mm1 19/32"
Scale length34"34"
Strap ButtonStandard—
Top woodSolid Red Cedar—
TunersLTDHipshot HB6
Fretboard inlay—Birds
Headstock Logo—Signature "SE"
Neck Depth At The 12 1 2 Fret—61/64"
Neck Depth At The 1 2 Fret—51/64"
Neck Width At The Body—2 33/64"
Truss rod—PRS Double-Acting
Truss Rod Cover—"Kingfisher"
Tuning—Bass (4 String): E, A, D, G

More JB-320E NATURAL SATIN comparisons